Rendered at 03:25:19 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
InsideOutSanta 13 hours ago [-]
I don't understand why this is set up the way it is. Maintaining a BitTorrent tracker for models seems like a reasonably good idea, but you have to "apply to join" to be able to contribute?
To what end?
gorszon 8 hours ago [-]
Its standard for private trackers, you don't want a malware infested hell like piratebay, plus generally you would want people to seed back what they downloaded at least.
InsideOutSanta 5 hours ago [-]
> generally you would want people to seed back what they downloaded at least
But the goal is preservation rather than sharing.
I'm confused about how the economics of that would work. If I wanted to contribute to this, I'd have to download the models, so I'd immediately be in the red, and then I could never get out of it because who's going to download these obsolete models? There's no download demand for them; if they were, the whole project would not be necessary.
torben-friis 5 hours ago [-]
>then I could never get out of it because who's going to download these obsolete models?
Private trackers usually overcome this issue by also rewarding the length of time you share, even if no one downloaded. Either you get a ratio of 1 or share for a full week/whatever length they decide is enough.
The ai description of this specific site seems to imply they do it as well.
simonmales 13 hours ago [-]
Accountability?
InsideOutSanta 13 hours ago [-]
You mean for people trying to poison the swarm? Or what? I'm genuinely confused.
satuke 12 hours ago [-]
people not maintaining 1:1 ratio, read about private trackers
InsideOutSanta 12 hours ago [-]
The content will be mostly obsolete LLM models. I don't see the incentive to download them in large quantities.
phantompeace 12 hours ago [-]
I can definitely picture a piece of content that's been scrubbed from everywhere except old copies of LLMs in which it still exists in a lossy form, with people trying to extract it from those old copies with the help of newer models. Private trackers have thrived for decades and will continue to do so because they allow a community to foster around a shared purpose (pardon the pun).
Although that being said, i doubt i would go through the trouble of signing up just for this purpose, personally.
InsideOutSanta 11 hours ago [-]
> I can definitely picture a piece of content that's been scrubbed from everywhere except old copies of LLMs in which it still exists in a lossy form
Yes. So it seems to me that the purpose of the project is to maintain a common good, but then I don't see how keeping it private achieves that.
captn3m0 12 hours ago [-]
Just do it like how libgen does. Maybe publish a RSS torrent feed people can subscribe to for the newer publications - knowing someone is curating the feed.
Weird to have open licensed stuff on private tracker.
tliltocatl 9 hours ago [-]
And what are you going to train the models on?
NamlchakKhandro 20 minutes ago [-]
[dead]
jcelerier 12 hours ago [-]
Why the restriction to safetensors and GGUF? onnx is the more common format and specifically made for interchange.
wtallis 6 hours ago [-]
Does anybody use ONNX for LLMs? I've only encountered it for small models packaged to run on consumer devices, and never seen it show up in any workstation or datacenter scenario.
jcelerier 3 hours ago [-]
If you have Google Chrome or Microsoft edge installed on your computer then you have a few gigabytes of onnx llm (Gemma for chrome, Phi for edge iirc) installed. On my side I use onnx for all local ai on https://ossia.io ; works great.
satuke 12 hours ago [-]
[flagged]
randomblock1 8 hours ago [-]
What is the difference between this and https://pirateface.co/ ? Private tracker, and a focus on old models?
gorszon 8 hours ago [-]
There doesn't need to be a difference, as with other torrent trackers, there are many of them, and I think thats good if nothing else, for redundancy.
modimihir 12 hours ago [-]
I see the merit in keeping a decentralized archive for open models. But there has to be a better way to do it vs keeping it behind auth and an application form.
satuke 12 hours ago [-]
it's light, not like usual trackers, it's only to make sure people seed 1:1 and to reduce load on a couple of people seeding large models to everyone. the only way to do that is to enforce it, and for that you need a place where you can possibly enforce it without making it platform run, so, that's why you have this.
To what end?
But the goal is preservation rather than sharing.
I'm confused about how the economics of that would work. If I wanted to contribute to this, I'd have to download the models, so I'd immediately be in the red, and then I could never get out of it because who's going to download these obsolete models? There's no download demand for them; if they were, the whole project would not be necessary.
Private trackers usually overcome this issue by also rewarding the length of time you share, even if no one downloaded. Either you get a ratio of 1 or share for a full week/whatever length they decide is enough.
The ai description of this specific site seems to imply they do it as well.
Although that being said, i doubt i would go through the trouble of signing up just for this purpose, personally.
Yes. So it seems to me that the purpose of the project is to maintain a common good, but then I don't see how keeping it private achieves that.
Weird to have open licensed stuff on private tracker.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oink%27s_Pink_Palace
https://pirateface.co/audnai/penclaw-GLM-5.3-abliterated